Environmental experts argue that precedent supports contested features of EPA’s major climate change rule.
Scholar argues the impact of halting the regulation's implementation may be small.
New study suggests some of the debate over environmental regulation stems from data differences.
In letter to court, states claim that a tweet proves the EPA has made up its mind.
A lower ozone standard means more benefits for Americans.
Two prominent economists introduce new questions into the debate over the social cost of carbon.
Recent Supreme Court decision misses a climate change solution that could satisfy all parties.
EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions is left largely intact, but agency faces rebuke.