Scholars examine the framing of fairness in debates over Canadian oils sands regulation.
At oral arguments, Justices question whether EPA considered costs of regulation at the right time.
Considering the costs and benefits of regulation should include indirect effects in the calculation.
EPA's consideration of costs in regulating toxic air pollutants should prove sufficient.
Apr 28, 2015 - Apr 30, 2015
RegBlog features commentaries on this term’s oral arguments in Michigan v. EPA.
Interior Department proposes new regulations for exploratory drilling offshore Alaska.
A lower ozone standard means more benefits for Americans.
A proposed rule would allow offshore aquaculture in the Gulf of Mexico.
PPR seminar focuses on controversial proposed rule aimed at combatting climate change.
Two prominent economists introduce new questions into the debate over the social cost of carbon.