A 2009 court decision could spur more cost-benefit analysis in the regulatory process.
CPSC considers costs of regulating corded window coverings, benefits to child safety.
EPA's consideration of costs in regulating toxic air pollutants should prove sufficient.
RegBlog features commentaries on this term’s oral arguments in Michigan v. EPA.
A lower ozone standard means more benefits for Americans.
Two prominent economists introduce new questions into the debate over the social cost of carbon.