RegBlog

RegBlog

Cost-Benefit Analysis

A Forecast of the Next Five Years in Regulation

May 12, 2016 PPR News

RegBlog’s fifth anniversary prompts illuminating debate about the best path for future regulators.

Tagged: , , , , , ,

A Paradigm Shift in the Cost-Benefit State

Apr 26, 2016 Opinion

A 2009 court decision could spur more cost-benefit analysis in the regulatory process.

Tagged: , ,

Better Policy Analysis Makes for a Better World

Mar 14, 2016 Opinion

Combining better analysis with more meaningful participation will improve policy decisions.

Tagged: , , ,

Reasons to Regulate When Benefits Can’t Be Quantified

Jun 10, 2015 Opinion

CPSC considers costs of regulating corded window coverings, benefits to child safety.

Tagged: , ,

The Supreme Court Scrutinizes EPA Regulation

Apr 30, 2015 Opinion

At oral arguments, Justices question whether EPA considered costs of regulation at the right time.

Tagged: , , ,

Counting Benefits at the High Court

Apr 29, 2015 Opinion

Considering the costs and benefits of regulation should include indirect effects in the calculation.

Tagged: , , ,

Supreme Court Weighs When Agencies Must Consider Costs

Apr 28, 2015 Opinion

EPA's consideration of costs in regulating toxic air pollutants should prove sufficient.

Tagged: , , ,

High Court Hears Debate Over Costs and Benefits of Regulating Air Pollution

Apr 28, 2015 - Apr 30, 2015 Series

RegBlog features commentaries on this term’s oral arguments in Michigan v. EPA.

Tagged: , , ,

EPA’s Ozone Standard Is Insufficiently Stringent, Not Overly Expensive

Feb 16, 2015 Opinion

A lower ozone standard means more benefits for Americans.

Tagged: , , , ,

What Is the Ideal Cost-Benefit Analysis?

Dec 10, 2014 Analysis

Two researchers propose a simpler way to perform cost-benefit analysis.

Tagged: , ,